Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSumanthiran, Shiloh
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-23T13:36:08Z
dc.date.available2022-03-23T13:36:08Z
dc.date.issued2020-09
dc.identifier.issn2386-1762
dc.identifier.urihttp://archive.veriteresearch.org/xmlui/handle/123456789/4568
dc.description3p. A different version of this insight was published in the Daily Mirror. See: The case for State supported maternity leave benefits in Sri Lanka. (2020 September 24). Daily Mirror. https://www.dailymirror.lk/features/The-case-for-State-supported-maternity-leave-benefits-in-Sri-Lanka/185-196527en_US
dc.description.abstractWomen in the 20-39 age cohort are uniquely and severely disadvantaged in the labour market in Sri Lanka. This disadvantage is linked to the current policy of placing the full cost of maternity leave benefits (MLBs) on employers. In this context, this makes hiring women costlier than hiring men and creates incentive for a discriminatory recruitment practice where male job applicants are preferred over female job applicants. This Insight offers a solution to this adverse incentive structure by suggesting state-sponsored maternity leave benefits to improve labour market participation and outcomes for women.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherColombo: Verité Researchen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVerité Insights;Vol. 8, No. 1
dc.subjectFemale labour force participationen_US
dc.subjectMaternity Leave Benefits - MLBen_US
dc.subjectSocial policy and welfareen_US
dc.subjectWomens employmenten_US
dc.subjectWomens welfareen_US
dc.subjectGender discrimination - labour recruitmenten_US
dc.titleState Funding for Maternity Leave in Sri Lanka - A No-braineren_US
dc.typeInsighten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record